2000 Chevrolet Astro vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Astro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Astro would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 510 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Mini Countryman. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Astro (338 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (240 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2000 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Astro | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mini |
Model | Astro | Countryman |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Body Type | Minivan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 184 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.4 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1895 kg | 1385 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2595 mm |