2000 Chevrolet Astro vs. 2013 Volvo XC90

To start off, 2013 Volvo XC90 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Astro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Astro would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 973 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Astro.

Because 2000 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Volvo XC90. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Astro (339 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Volvo XC90. (320 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Volvo XC90. 2000 Chevrolet Astro has automatic transmission and 2013 Volvo XC90 has manual transmission. 2013 Volvo XC90 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chevrolet Astro will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Chevrolet Astro 2013 Volvo XC90
Make Chevrolet Volvo
Model Astro XC90
Year Released 2000 2013
Body Type Minivan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4300 cc 3200 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 0 HP 237 HP
Torque 339 Nm 320 Nm
Drive Type 4WD Front
Transmission Type Automatic 6-speed manual
Number of Seats 8 seats 7 seats
Vehicle Weight 1187 kg 2160 kg
Vehicle Length 4830 mm 4807 mm
Vehicle Width 1980 mm 1936 mm
Vehicle Height 1940 mm 1784 mm
Wheelbase Size 2790 mm 2857 mm