2000 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 1952 Holden FX

To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Blazer (190 HP) has 139 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 920 kg more than 1952 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Holden FX. (136 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Holden FX. 2000 Chevrolet Blazer has automatic transmission and 1952 Holden FX has manual transmission. 1952 Holden FX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chevrolet Blazer will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: