2000 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 1965 Seat 600
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 600 would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 1315 kg more than 1965 Seat 600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm) has 292 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Blazer | 1965 Seat 600 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Seat |
| Model | Blazer | 600 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4300 cc | 767 cc |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 47 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1890 kg | 575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2010 mm |
