2000 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 1973 Holden UTE
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Holden UTE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Holden UTE would be higher. At 5,047 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Holden UTE (240 HP) has 50 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Blazer. (190 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Blazer.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Holden UTE (427 Nm) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Blazer. (339 Nm). This means 1973 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Blazer.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Blazer | 1973 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
| Model | Blazer | UTE |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1973 |
| Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4300 cc | 5047 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 240 HP |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 427 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 75 L |
