2000 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Blazer (190 HP) has 7 more horse power than 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo. (183 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 795 kg more than 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo. (305 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Blazer | 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Maserati |
Model | Blazer | Bi Turbo |
Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 4300 cc | 2491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 183 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 305 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1890 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2510 mm |