2000 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 410 kg more than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Blazer | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Chevrolet | Oldsmobile |
Model | Blazer | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4300 cc | 3790 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1890 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2760 mm |