2000 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2001 Lancia Nea
To start off, 2001 Lancia Nea is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Blazer (190 HP) has 42 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 520 kg more than 2001 Lancia Nea. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Blazer is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Chevrolet Blazer. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Lancia Nea. (314 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Lancia Nea.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Blazer | 2001 Lancia Nea | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lancia |
Model | Blazer | Nea |
Year Released | 2000 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4300 cc | 2445 cc |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 314 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1890 kg | 1370 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2590 mm |