2000 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2005 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (191 HP) has 1 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Blazer. (190 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Blazer.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chevrolet Blazer. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Jeep Wrangler. (319 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Blazer | 2005 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Jeep |
| Model | Blazer | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4300 cc | 3966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 191 HP |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 72 L |
