2000 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2008 Jaguar XJ6
To start off, 2008 Jaguar XJ6 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jaguar XJ6 (235 HP) has 45 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Blazer. (190 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jaguar XJ6 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Blazer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 270 kg more than 2008 Jaguar XJ6.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Jaguar XJ6. (293 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Jaguar XJ6.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Blazer | 2008 Jaguar XJ6 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jaguar |
Model | Blazer | XJ6 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4300 cc | 2967 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 235 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 293 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1890 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3040 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 85 L |