2000 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2008 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2008 Jaguar XK is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jaguar XK (300 HP) has 110 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Blazer. (190 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Blazer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 155 kg more than 2008 Jaguar XK.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jaguar XK (421 Nm) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Blazer. (339 Nm). This means 2008 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Blazer.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Blazer | 2008 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jaguar |
Model | Blazer | XK |
Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4300 cc | 4200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 300 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 421 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1890 kg | 1735 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 70 L |