2000 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2011 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2011 Jaguar XF is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jaguar XF (385 HP) has 195 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Blazer. (190 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Blazer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 45 kg more than 2011 Jaguar XF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jaguar XF (515 Nm) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Blazer. (339 Nm). This means 2011 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Blazer.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Blazer | 2011 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jaguar |
Model | Blazer | XF |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4300 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 385 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 515 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1890 kg | 1845 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2908 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 70 L |