2000 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2012 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Blazer (190 HP) has 25 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva. (165 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva.
Because 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chevrolet Blazer. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva. (230 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Blazer | 2012 Chevrolet Captiva | |
Make | Chevrolet | Chevrolet |
Model | Blazer | Captiva |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4300 cc | 2384 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 165 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 230 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4673 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1756 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2707 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 65 L |