2000 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (314 HP) has 124 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Blazer. (190 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Blazer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 32 kg more than 2013 Cadillac CTS.

Because 2013 Cadillac CTS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chevrolet Blazer. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS (373 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Blazer. (339 Nm). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Blazer.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Chevrolet Blazer 2013 Cadillac CTS
Make Chevrolet Cadillac
Model Blazer CTS
Year Released 2000 2013
Body Type SUV Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4300 cc 3600 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 190 HP 314 HP
Torque 339 Nm 373 Nm
Drive Type Rear AWD
Transmission Type Automatic 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 1890 kg 1858 kg
Vehicle Length 4610 mm 4788 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1882 mm
Vehicle Height 1710 mm 1442 mm
Wheelbase Size 2660 mm 2880 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 57 L 68 L