2000 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2013 Volvo S60
To start off, 2013 Volvo S60 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo S60 (247 HP) has 57 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Blazer. (190 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Blazer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 277 kg more than 2013 Volvo S60.
Because 2013 Volvo S60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chevrolet Blazer. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo S60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo S60 (361 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Blazer. (339 Nm). This means 2013 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Blazer.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Blazer | 2013 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Blazer | S60 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4300 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | W |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 247 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 361 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1890 kg | 1613 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2097 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1484 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2776 mm |