2000 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1941 Volvo PV
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Volvo PV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Volvo PV would be higher. At 5,670 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 50 kg more than 1941 Volvo PV.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Camaro | 1941 Volvo PV | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
| Model | Camaro | PV |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1941 |
| Engine Size | 5670 cc | 3668 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 85 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1490 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2880 mm |
