2000 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1949 Hudson Commodore
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Hudson Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Hudson Commodore would be higher. At 4,166 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Hudson Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (191 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1949 Hudson Commodore. (128 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1949 Hudson Commodore. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Hudson Commodore weights approximately 66 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Camaro | 1949 Hudson Commodore | |
Make | Chevrolet | Hudson |
Model | Camaro | Commodore |
Year Released | 2000 | 1949 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 4166 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 191 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1656 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1960 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 3160 mm |