2000 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1952 Talbot Baby
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 5,670 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Talbot Baby weights approximately 462 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Camaro | 1952 Talbot Baby | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Talbot |
| Model | Camaro | Baby |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1952 |
| Engine Size | 5670 cc | 2690 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1188 kg | 1650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 3130 mm |
