2000 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1956 Morris Cowley
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Morris Cowley. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Morris Cowley would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (191 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 1956 Morris Cowley. (41 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1956 Morris Cowley. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 536 kg more than 1956 Morris Cowley. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Camaro | 1956 Morris Cowley | |
Make | Chevrolet | Morris |
Model | Camaro | Cowley |
Year Released | 2000 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 191 HP | 41 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1054 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2440 mm |