2000 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1958 Wartburg 312
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Wartburg 312. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Wartburg 312 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (191 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 1958 Wartburg 312. (36 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1958 Wartburg 312. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 630 kg more than 1958 Wartburg 312. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (305 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 223 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Wartburg 312. (82 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2000 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Wartburg 312.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Camaro | 1958 Wartburg 312 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Wartburg |
Model | Camaro | 312 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 191 HP | 36 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 82 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2460 mm |