2000 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1961 Mitsubishi A10
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Mitsubishi A10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Mitsubishi A10 would be higher. At 5,670 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 713 kg more than 1961 Mitsubishi A10.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (454 Nm) has 420 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Mitsubishi A10. (34 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Mitsubishi A10.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Camaro | 1961 Mitsubishi A10 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Camaro | A10 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1961 |
| Engine Size | 5670 cc | 493 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 20 HP |
| Torque | 454 Nm | 34 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1188 kg | 475 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1400 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2070 mm |
