2000 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1962 Holden FB Special
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden FB Special. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden FB Special would be higher. At 5,670 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 88 kg more than 1962 Holden FB Special.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (454 Nm) has 291 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden FB Special. (163 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden FB Special.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Camaro | 1962 Holden FB Special | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Camaro | FB Special |
Year Released | 2000 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5670 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 64 HP |
Torque | 454 Nm | 163 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1188 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2670 mm |