2000 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1963 DKW F 11
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 5,670 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 810 kg more than 1963 DKW F 11.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW F 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm) has 397 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 DKW F 11. (71 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 DKW F 11.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Camaro | 1963 DKW F 11 | |
Make | Chevrolet | DKW |
Model | Camaro | F 11 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5670 cc | 794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 34 HP |
Torque | 468 Nm | 71 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2260 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 31 L |