2000 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 would be higher. At 9,371 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (770 HP) has 666 more horse power than 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. (104 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 172 kg more than 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Camaro | 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
| Model | Camaro | Dove GTR4 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 9371 cc | 2138 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 770 HP | 104 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2140 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 29 L |
