2000 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1964 Fiat Grand Break
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Fiat Grand Break. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Fiat Grand Break would be higher. At 9,371 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (770 HP) has 674 more horse power than 1964 Fiat Grand Break. (96 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1964 Fiat Grand Break. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Fiat Grand Break weights approximately 83 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (926 Nm) has 784 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Fiat Grand Break. (142 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Fiat Grand Break.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Camaro | 1964 Fiat Grand Break | |
Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
Model | Camaro | Grand Break |
Year Released | 2000 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 9371 cc | 1795 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 770 HP | 96 HP |
Torque | 926 Nm | 142 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1270 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 70 L |