2000 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1964 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 9,371 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (770 HP) has 681 more horse power than 1964 Triumph 2000. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 17 kg more than 1964 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (926 Nm) has 768 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Camaro | 1964 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
| Model | Camaro | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 9371 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 770 HP | 89 HP |
| Torque | 926 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 114.3 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 114.3 mm | 76 mm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 64 L |
