2000 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1965 Volvo 220
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 9,371 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (770 HP) has 696 more horse power than 1965 Volvo 220. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1965 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 172 kg more than 1965 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (926 Nm) has 782 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Volvo 220. (144 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Camaro | 1965 Volvo 220 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
| Model | Camaro | 220 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 9371 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 770 HP | 74 HP |
| Torque | 926 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 45 L |
