2000 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1967 Mazda Luce
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Luce. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Luce would be higher. At 5,670 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 490 kg more than 1967 Mazda Luce.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm) has 350 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Luce. (118 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Luce.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Camaro | 1967 Mazda Luce | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Camaro | Luce |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5670 cc | 1490 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 468 Nm | 118 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1050 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 55 L |
