2000 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1967 Mercury Montclair
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Montclair. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Montclair would be higher. At 6,989 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Montclair is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Mercury Montclair weights approximately 172 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mercury Montclair (626 Nm) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Camaro. (454 Nm). This means 1967 Mercury Montclair will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Camaro | 1967 Mercury Montclair | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mercury |
Model | Camaro | Montclair |
Year Released | 2000 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5670 cc | 6989 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 340 HP |
Torque | 454 Nm | 626 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1188 kg | 1360 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 5560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 3130 mm |