2000 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1967 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 5,670 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 688 kg more than 1967 Suzuki Fronte.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (454 Nm) has 422 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Camaro | 1967 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
| Model | Camaro | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1967 |
| Engine Size | 5670 cc | 358 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 18 HP |
| Torque | 454 Nm | 32 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1188 kg | 500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2060 mm |
