2000 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1968 Pontiac Grande Parisienne
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Pontiac Grande Parisienne. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Pontiac Grande Parisienne would be higher. At 5,670 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Pontiac Grande Parisienne weights approximately 220 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Pontiac Grande Parisienne. (441 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Pontiac Grande Parisienne.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Camaro | 1968 Pontiac Grande Parisienne | |
Make | Chevrolet | Pontiac |
Model | Camaro | Grande Parisienne |
Year Released | 2000 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5670 cc | 5317 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 468 Nm | 441 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1760 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 5510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 102 L |