2000 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1975 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mercedes-Benz E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mercedes-Benz E would be higher. At 9,371 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (770 HP) has 676 more horse power than 1975 Mercedes-Benz E. (94 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1975 Mercedes-Benz E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 143 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (926 Nm) has 766 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Mercedes-Benz E. (160 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Mercedes-Benz E.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Camaro | 1975 Mercedes-Benz E | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Camaro | E |
Year Released | 2000 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 9371 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 770 HP | 94 HP |
Torque | 926 Nm | 160 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 114.3 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 114.3 mm | 83.6 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1330 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2760 mm |