2000 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1975 Triumph Spitfire
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Triumph Spitfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Triumph Spitfire would be higher. At 5,670 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 725 kg more than 1975 Triumph Spitfire.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm) has 368 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Triumph Spitfire. (100 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Triumph Spitfire.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Camaro | 1975 Triumph Spitfire | |
Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
Model | Camaro | Spitfire |
Year Released | 2000 | 1975 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5670 cc | 1492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 56 HP |
Torque | 468 Nm | 100 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 815 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2110 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 33 L |