2000 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1977 Oldsmobile Omega
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Oldsmobile Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Oldsmobile Omega would be higher. At 3,390 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 264 kg more than 1977 Oldsmobile Omega.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Oldsmobile Omega, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Camaro | 1977 Oldsmobile Omega | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Camaro | Omega |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3390 cc | 2474 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1413 kg | 1149 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2670 mm |
