2000 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1978 Skoda L
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Skoda L would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (191 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1978 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1978 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 765 kg more than 1978 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (305 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 231 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Skoda L. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Camaro | 1978 Skoda L | |
Make | Chevrolet | Skoda |
Model | Camaro | L |
Year Released | 2000 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1046 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 191 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 74 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 825 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2410 mm |