2000 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1982 Lamborghini LM
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lamborghini LM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lamborghini LM would be higher. At 5,670 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Lamborghini LM weights approximately 1060 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 1982 Lamborghini LM is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Lamborghini LM will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Lamborghini LM. (427 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Lamborghini LM.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Camaro | 1982 Lamborghini LM | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lamborghini |
Model | Camaro | LM |
Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5670 cc | 4754 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 327 HP |
Torque | 468 Nm | 427 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 2600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2050 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 3010 mm |