2000 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1984 Fiat Argenta
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Fiat Argenta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Fiat Argenta would be higher. At 3,390 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (158 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1984 Fiat Argenta. (100 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1984 Fiat Argenta.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (271 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Fiat Argenta. (135 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2000 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Fiat Argenta.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Camaro | 1984 Fiat Argenta | |
Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
Model | Camaro | Argenta |
Year Released | 2000 | 1984 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3390 cc | 1584 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 71.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 35 L |