2000 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1984 Lamborghini LM
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Lamborghini LM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Lamborghini LM would be higher. At 7,257 cc (12 cylinders), 1984 Lamborghini LM is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Lamborghini LM weights approximately 1160 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 1984 Lamborghini LM is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Lamborghini LM will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Lamborghini LM (589 Nm) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Camaro. (468 Nm). This means 1984 Lamborghini LM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Camaro | 1984 Lamborghini LM | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Lamborghini |
| Model | Camaro | LM |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1984 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5670 cc | 7257 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 414 HP |
| Torque | 468 Nm | 589 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 2700 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 3010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 110 L |
