2000 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1986 Mazda 929
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 9,371 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (770 HP) has 580 more horse power than 1986 Mazda 929. (190 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1986 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Mazda 929 weights approximately 438 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (926 Nm) has 667 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Mazda 929. (259 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Camaro | 1986 Mazda 929 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Camaro | 929 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 9371 cc | 2953 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 770 HP | 190 HP |
| Torque | 926 Nm | 259 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 114.3 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 114.3 mm | 77.4 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1625 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2720 mm |
