2000 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1999 Mazda 626

To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 5,670 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 260 kg more than 1999 Mazda 626.

Because 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm) has 298 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda 626. (170 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda 626.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Chevrolet Camaro 1999 Mazda 626
Make Chevrolet Mazda
Model Camaro 626
Year Released 2000 1999
Body Type Coupe Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5670 cc 1991 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 0 HP 114 HP
Torque 468 Nm 170 Nm
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1540 kg 1280 kg
Vehicle Length 4910 mm 4710 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1330 mm 1520 mm
Wheelbase Size 2570 mm 2680 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 57 L 64 L