2000 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1999 Nissan SUT
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan SUT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan SUT would be higher. At 3,390 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (158 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1999 Nissan SUT. (140 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1999 Nissan SUT.
Because 1999 Nissan SUT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Nissan SUT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan SUT (372 Nm) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Camaro. (271 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan SUT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Camaro. 1999 Nissan SUT has automatic transmission and 2000 Chevrolet Camaro has manual transmission. 2000 Chevrolet Camaro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Nissan SUT will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Camaro | 1999 Nissan SUT | |
Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
Model | Camaro | SUT |
Year Released | 2000 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3390 cc | 3299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 372 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |