2000 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2000 Ford Artic
To start off, both 2000 Chevrolet Camaro and 2000 Ford Artic were released in the same year (2000). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 9,371 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (770 HP) has 642 more horse power than 2000 Ford Artic. (128 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Artic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Artic weights approximately 111 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (926 Nm) has 601 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Artic. (325 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Artic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Camaro | 2000 Ford Artic | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Camaro | Artic |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 9371 cc | 3998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 770 HP | 128 HP |
| Torque | 926 Nm | 325 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1298 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 3200 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 68 L |
