2000 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2001 Lancia Nea
To start off, 2001 Lancia Nea is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 9,371 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (770 HP) has 622 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Lancia Nea weights approximately 183 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (926 Nm) has 612 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Lancia Nea. (314 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Lancia Nea.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Camaro | 2001 Lancia Nea | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lancia |
Model | Camaro | Nea |
Year Released | 2000 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 9371 cc | 2445 cc |
Horse Power | 770 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 926 Nm | 314 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1370 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2590 mm |