2000 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2002 Suzuki F1
To start off, 2002 Suzuki F1 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,670 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 70 kg more than 2002 Suzuki F1.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm) has 362 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki F1. (106 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki F1. 2002 Suzuki F1 has automatic transmission and 2000 Chevrolet Camaro has manual transmission. 2000 Chevrolet Camaro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Suzuki F1 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Camaro | 2002 Suzuki F1 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
| Model | Camaro | F1 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 5670 cc | 1995 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 67 HP |
| Torque | 468 Nm | 106 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1470 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 45 L |
