2000 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Colt

To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,670 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 520 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Colt.

Because 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm) has 322 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mitsubishi Colt. (146 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mitsubishi Colt.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Chevrolet Camaro 2004 Mitsubishi Colt
Make Chevrolet Mitsubishi
Model Camaro Colt
Year Released 2000 2004
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5670 cc 1493 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 0 HP 108 HP
Torque 468 Nm 146 Nm
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1540 kg 1020 kg
Vehicle Length 4910 mm 3880 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1330 mm 1560 mm
Wheelbase Size 2570 mm 2510 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 57 L 47 L