2000 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara
To start off, 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 9,371 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (770 HP) has 605 more horse power than 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara. (165 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara weights approximately 223 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Camaro.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (926 Nm) has 706 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara. (220 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Camaro | 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
| Model | Camaro | Grand Vitara |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 9371 cc | 2489 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 770 HP | 165 HP |
| Torque | 926 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 114.3 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 114.3 mm | 75 mm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1410 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2490 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 64 L |
