2000 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2006 Volkswagen Eos

To start off, 2006 Volkswagen Eos is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,670 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Volkswagen Eos weights approximately 50 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Camaro.

Because 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Eos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm) has 268 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Volkswagen Eos. (200 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Volkswagen Eos.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Chevrolet Camaro 2006 Volkswagen Eos
Make Chevrolet Volkswagen
Model Camaro Eos
Year Released 2000 2006
Body Type Coupe Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5670 cc 1982 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 0 HP 148 HP
Torque 468 Nm 200 Nm
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1540 kg 1590 kg
Vehicle Length 4910 mm 4410 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1330 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2570 mm 2580 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 57 L 55 L