2000 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2008 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 9,371 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1225 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (926 Nm) has 426 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Jeep Commander. (500 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Jeep Commander.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Camaro | 2008 Jeep Commander | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Jeep |
| Model | Camaro | Commander |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 9371 cc | 5654 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 770 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 926 Nm | 500 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 114.3 mm | 99.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 114.3 mm | 90.9 mm |
| Top Speed | 370 km/hour | 208 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 2412 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2790 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 78 L |
