2000 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2008 Nissan Navara
To start off, 2008 Nissan Navara is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,670 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Navara weights approximately 492 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 2008 Nissan Navara is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Navara will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Nissan Navara. (403 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Nissan Navara.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Camaro | 2008 Nissan Navara | |
Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
Model | Camaro | Navara |
Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5670 cc | 2488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 172 HP |
Torque | 468 Nm | 403 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 2032 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 3210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 80 L |