2000 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2010 BMW 528
To start off, 2010 BMW 528 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,670 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 BMW 528 weights approximately 125 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 2010 BMW 528 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 BMW 528 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 BMW 528. (271 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 BMW 528.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Camaro | 2010 BMW 528 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | BMW |
| Model | Camaro | 528 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5670 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 230 HP |
| Torque | 468 Nm | 271 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1665 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4854 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1847 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1481 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2888 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 70 L |
